Install this theme

A great line from Eunice Kennedy Shriver:

“Let me win. But if I cannot win, then let me be brave in the attempt.”

2012 Global Peace Index
The Institute for Economics and Peace announced their 2012 Global Peace Index rankings on 12 June and sub-Saharan Africa received some good news - the region is no longer listed as the “Least Peaceful” region on Earth!
That distinction now belongs to the lumped together Middle East & North Africa.
This is understandable considering that they added nations affected by the turbulent Arab Spring movement, to the perennially least peaceful nations of Iraq (155), Sudan (156) and Afghanistan (157).
Syria, Egypt, Tunisia and Oman are listed as nations becoming “less peaceful”.
We still have a long way to go, with Somalia (158) and DRC (154) being listed amongst the bottom 5 of least peaceful countries of the 158 countries assessed.
For the second year in a row, Iceland was listed as the most peaceful nation, and Western Europe as the most peaceful region.
With the end of its Civil War, Sri Lanka made the biggest jump this year, going from 130 in 2011 to 103 in 2012.
The good news is that, according to GPI’s Indicators, every other region in the world has become more peaceful by some amount.
But is the absence of war really peace?
Here are the GPI Indicators that the Institute for Economics and Peace have outlined.
It is hard to argue that things like decreased military expenditure, violent crime and number of homicides are not valid indicators of peace. But what about other social structures that can harm individuals?
Proponents of the Structural Violence model, like Johan Galtung or Paul Farmer, would probably have us look at a host of more subtle factors when determining the level of peace in the world. For example, we can look at health care most specifically.      
                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                    

The WHO estimates that 650,000 people died from Malaria in 2010. And most of those deaths occurred in Africa. A lack of enough mosquito nets is a structural violence issue - it is not caused by a man with a gun, or by a lack of police or security forces. It is caused by the invisible societal structures of inequality, yet it still causes injury and death to people.
                                                                                                                                              



So, for the child that may die from malaria in Africa from a lack of mosquito nets, the GPI data showing their country becoming slightly more “peaceful” is not very comforting.

2012 Global Peace Index


The Institute for Economics and Peace announced their 2012 Global Peace Index rankings on 12 June and sub-Saharan Africa received some good news - the region is no longer listed as the “Least Peaceful” region on Earth!

That distinction now belongs to the lumped together Middle East & North Africa.

This is understandable considering that they added nations affected by the turbulent Arab Spring movement, to the perennially least peaceful nations of Iraq (155), Sudan (156) and Afghanistan (157).

Syria, Egypt, Tunisia and Oman are listed as nations becoming “less peaceful”.

We still have a long way to go, with Somalia (158) and DRC (154) being listed amongst the bottom 5 of least peaceful countries of the 158 countries assessed.

For the second year in a row, Iceland was listed as the most peaceful nation, and Western Europe as the most peaceful region.

With the end of its Civil War, Sri Lanka made the biggest jump this year, going from 130 in 2011 to 103 in 2012.

The good news is that, according to GPI’s Indicators, every other region in the world has become more peaceful by some amount.

But is the absence of war really peace?

Here are the GPI Indicators that the Institute for Economics and Peace have outlined.

It is hard to argue that things like decreased military expenditure, violent crime and number of homicides are not valid indicators of peace. But what about other social structures that can harm individuals?

Proponents of the Structural Violence model, like Johan Galtung or Paul Farmer, would probably have us look at a host of more subtle factors when determining the level of peace in the world. For example, we can look at health care most specifically.      
                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                    
The WHO estimates that 650,000 people died from Malaria in 2010. And most of those deaths occurred in Africa. A lack of enough mosquito nets is a structural violence issue - it is not caused by a man with a gun, or by a lack of police or security forces. It is caused by the invisible societal structures of inequality, yet it still causes injury and death to people.
                                                                                                                                              
So, for the child that may die from malaria in Africa from a lack of mosquito nets, the GPI data showing their country becoming slightly more “peaceful” is not very comforting.